Let’s face it, as soon as someone achieves any sort of notariety, they will become a target for public mud-raking. I don’t care if you’re the pope himself, someone is going to see something bad about you for what-ever reason. I have yet to read the article debasing JC, but I will say this right off the bat, whatever it says will probably be no worse then what future critics have to say about Mr. Cumming’s work. I saw no sign of racism in that trailor. A question I’d like to pose a little pre-maturely is this: was the author of the review in question black? If so, then fine, there “may” (note the quotation marks) be some validation there. If not, then who the hell gave this guy the authority to determine what black people find offensive?

Let’s face it, as soon as someone achieves any sort of notariety, they will become a target for public mud-raking. I don’t care if you’re the pope himself, someone is going to see something bad about you for what-ever reason. I have yet to read the article debasing JC, but I will say this right off the bat, whatever it says will probably be no worse then what future critics have to say about Mr. Cumming’s work. I saw no sign of racism in that trailor. A question I’d like to pose a little pre-maturely is this: was the author of the review in question black? If so, then fine, there “may” (note the quotation marks) be some validation there. If not, then who the hell gave this guy the authority to determine what black people find offensive?