Jim Cummings The Princess and The Frog Teaser-gate continues

So here is a blog post that is pretty a typical for how the internet is reacting to this teaser:

The f***ing firefly. Sorry. We’re talking about a kids movie here, so I shouldn’t be swearing. But that’s reflective of how visceral my reaction was to the last 10 seconds of the trailer. After 50 seconds of a pretty princess with at least vaguely racially specific features — i.e. she isn’t just Bella, Ariel or Amy Adams from “Enchanted” painted dark — not smooching a frog, out of nowhere comes this jive-talking, toothless bug speaking with the thickest bayou accent imaginable. And I have to say that my instant reaction was “Oh my God, this is going to be like ‘Song of the South’ and this movie will have to be buried forever.” My immediate read was that Disney was milking every imaginable stereotype of uneducated — but inevitably WISE!!!! — aged black masculinity imaginable. Give that fly a corncob pipe and a pimp walk and he could be Scarlett O’Hara’s man-servant or one of the crows from “Dumbo.” I mostly forgive the “Dumbo” stereotyping in that quaint “They didn’t know any better, but at least they were trying” way. I went back and watched a second time and even though the firefly still looks like he’s the sort of caricature of a cracked out bum Dave Chappelle might have parodied, I’m now figuring he’s meant to just be Cajun, which may be just as inappropriate. Moreso, actually, because obviously Disney’s people are cautious about offending African-American groups, but I’m skeptical the Cajuns have as strong a lobby. The character is [apparently] voiced by Jim Cummings, who is deservedly a huge star in the voiceover world. All respect to Jim Cummings. But Jim Cummings is also a white guy. Wikipedia tells me he spent extensive time in New Orleans, but again… I dunno if that makes it better. In fact, I’m pretty sure it doesn’t. The problem here is the character and the direction, though, and not Cummings, who’s just doing what he’s being paid to do… We’ve just reached a point at which Disney should know better, particularly on a film on which they’re so clearly trying to be progressive. -Check the Fein Print

The bold and Italics are mine because this sentence is a big part of this witch hunt. Jim Cummings has spent more than some time in New Orleans and has continue to be a part of the community long after he became famous. For heaven’s sake, look at his website! The whole thing is a tribute to New Orleans. If you find the clip offensive for your own reasons, that is fine, but turning it around to say that JC only spent “some time” in New Orleans and thus isn’t qualified to be in this movie is just plain silly. I am willing to bet JC, with his long history with Disney and love of New Orleans was the first in line for this film.

I wanted to try to not really express my opinions on this but I do have to say one thing. Everyone who objects to Jim Cummings and Randy Newman in the trailer because they are white needs to take five seconds and remember that A) white people also live in New Orleans and B) with animated characters, the race of the voice over actor does not necessarily reflect the race of the character they are playing, so if you knew that Jim Cummings was black playing a white character, would you be this upset?

My other biggest issue with this is that most people are angry because they feel like Jim Cummings is playing a racial stereotype. Does that mean that you would be comfortable with it if you knew he was just playing good old white trash?

This drama is facinating me. I know Disney cannot win because someone is always going to be offended by something they do but the fact that this much vitriol is directed towards a two second clip because the voice acter playing one character “didn’t spend enough time in New Orleans” or is “too white to be in this movie” has moved beyond rational sense to me.

This entry was posted in Jim Cummings, Jim Cummings' Voice Work, Movies and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://fienprint.blogspot.com/ Daniel

    Hi…

    Thanks for the link, though I guess we’re gonna agree to disagree on this one…

    I tried to make it clear in my post that my problem isn’t with Cummings. He’s a voice actor and has been hired to voice all sorts of people, animals and things that have no resemblance to who he is as a person. That’s his job and he does it well. The problem is with the writers and directors who think the easy reliance on stereotypes is acceptable. It’s creatively lazy at best.

    But honestly, no it doesn’t matter to me one iota if Jim Cummings had spent 30 years in New Orleans, because he wouldn’t have spent that time as a toothless Cajun man, so whether he’s from New Orleans or from Boston, he’s doing a caricature. Even if he actually *were* a toothless Cajun man, the *character* would be a problem. It would just be more authentic.

    The difference on if the character were just “good old white trash” is simple: In the media, there are countless representations of whiteness, both good and evil, smart and stupid, wealthy and poor. If a Disney movie decides to have a “good old white trash” character, it’s counter-balanced by the 75 years of noble white princes the Disney animators have created. It wouldn’t be *good* per se — it’s still creatively lazy, as caricatures usually are — but one caricature here or there doesn’t even make a ripple. However, in popular entertainment, there are very, very, very few Cajun characters. So for Disney to create their first an only Cajun character and basically make him an interchangeable racial caricature is a problem. It isn’t just a ripple. It’s a wave. It’s the sort of thing that Disney did with black characters back in the ’30s and ’40s and ’50s. It was racist then and, really, it’s racist now.

    Or that’s how I look at it…

    -Daniel
    Check the Fien (“i before e”) Print

  • http://fienprint.blogspot.com Daniel

    Hi…

    Thanks for the link, though I guess we’re gonna agree to disagree on this one…

    I tried to make it clear in my post that my problem isn’t with Cummings. He’s a voice actor and has been hired to voice all sorts of people, animals and things that have no resemblance to who he is as a person. That’s his job and he does it well. The problem is with the writers and directors who think the easy reliance on stereotypes is acceptable. It’s creatively lazy at best.

    But honestly, no it doesn’t matter to me one iota if Jim Cummings had spent 30 years in New Orleans, because he wouldn’t have spent that time as a toothless Cajun man, so whether he’s from New Orleans or from Boston, he’s doing a caricature. Even if he actually *were* a toothless Cajun man, the *character* would be a problem. It would just be more authentic.

    The difference on if the character were just “good old white trash” is simple: In the media, there are countless representations of whiteness, both good and evil, smart and stupid, wealthy and poor. If a Disney movie decides to have a “good old white trash” character, it’s counter-balanced by the 75 years of noble white princes the Disney animators have created. It wouldn’t be *good* per se — it’s still creatively lazy, as caricatures usually are — but one caricature here or there doesn’t even make a ripple. However, in popular entertainment, there are very, very, very few Cajun characters. So for Disney to create their first an only Cajun character and basically make him an interchangeable racial caricature is a problem. It isn’t just a ripple. It’s a wave. It’s the sort of thing that Disney did with black characters back in the ’30s and ’40s and ’50s. It was racist then and, really, it’s racist now.

    Or that’s how I look at it…

    -Daniel
    Check the Fien (“i before e”) Print